Lab 1: M1.1 Fundamentals

The above layout shows the precision of the data collected by comparing the data to the average point (the star) It was found that the data was precise within 4.5 meters of this location (the yellow area). The data was also found to be accurate within 9.3 meters. Precision was determined by comparing the test waypoints to the average location and determining the distance where 68% of the points fell were within the distance. Accuracy was determined using the same method but rather than using an average location it was determined where 68% of the data was within range of a benchmark location known to be the 'correct' location. With this it was determined that the data is more precise than accurate since the data is clustered more around the average than the reference point.

Comments

Lab 5: M 2.2 Interpolation

This weeks module focused on identifying the best interpolation method for modeling the air quality over Tampa Bay. Four methods were tested using the same set of sample points Thiessen, Inverse Weighted Distance (IDW), Tensioned Spline (seen above), Regularized Spline. Thiessen Interpolation assigns all cells in the raster with the value of the nearest sample point. IDW calculates the value of all cells by considered multiple sample points nearby and giving closer points a higher weight than further points. Both Spline methods create a smooth surface over the sample points but the regularized version creates a smooth curvature regardless of the range of values in the sample meaning cell values can end up both above and below the minimum and maximum values found in the sample. The tension model attempts to fix this by constricted the curvature of values to the ranges found in the sample points.

Module 2 Lab: Land Use / Land Cover Classification, Ground Truthing and Accuracy Assessment

The above map shows digitized land use/land cover (LULC) classifications for Pascagoula, MS. A set of 30 random sampling points were created post creation of the LULC layer and they were verified in google street view to determine accuracy. Based on these points the LULC model was found to be 86.6% accurate.

Applications in GIS Module 2

This weeks module focused on using LiDAR data to determine the height and density of a section of Shenandoah National Forest in Virginia. Mostly this involved converting the LiDAR data to a raster and running various tools to achieve the desired datasets. New tools included LAS Dataset To Raster, LAS to MultiPoint, Con, Plus, Float, and Divide. Additionally a histogram was created to display the heights of cells in the forest. Density and DSM: Height with Graph: LiDAR:

GIS Portfolio - Michael Malone

Search This Blog