Skip to main content

Lab 1: M1.1 Fundamentals

 


The above layout shows the precision of the data collected by comparing the data to the average point (the star) It was found that the data was precise within 4.5 meters of this location (the yellow area). The data was also found to be accurate within 9.3 meters. Precision was determined by comparing the test waypoints to the average location and determining the distance where 68% of the points fell were within the distance. Accuracy was determined using the same method but rather than using an average location it was determined where 68% of the data was within range of a benchmark location known to be the 'correct' location. With this it was determined that the data is more precise than accurate since the data is clustered more around the average than the reference point.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lab 5: M 2.2 Interpolation

  This weeks module focused on identifying the best interpolation method for modeling the air quality over Tampa Bay. Four methods were tested using the same set of sample points Thiessen, Inverse Weighted Distance (IDW), Tensioned Spline (seen above), Regularized Spline. Thiessen Interpolation assigns all cells in the raster with the value of the nearest sample point. IDW calculates the value of all cells by considered multiple sample points nearby and giving closer points a higher weight than further points. Both Spline methods create a smooth surface over the sample points but the regularized version creates a smooth curvature regardless of the range of values in the sample meaning cell values can end up both above and below the minimum and maximum values found in the sample. The tension model attempts to fix this by constricted the curvature of values to the ranges found in the sample points.
Post a Comment
Read more

GIS 6005 - Module 2

  Nevada is my area of Interest. There a three separate state planes for Nevada; east, west, and central. For this reason, the state plane was not the appropriate choice. I decided to use NAD 1983 UTM Zone 11N because Nevada fits entirely within that UTM zone.
Post a Comment
Read more

GIS 6005 - Module 6

  Because the data provided for the above map contained positive and negative values which ArcMap does not support for proportional symbols, the data had to be modified. All states with positive values were exported to a new shapefile and the same was done with states with negative values. This was all that needed done with the positive valued states. However, for the negative valued states a new field needed added to the attribute table and it had to be populated with the absolute value of number of jobs lost to convert them to positive integers.  To prepare the data for bivariate visualization classes needed to be made. To do this, three class quantification was applied to each desired variable to divide each into three relatively equal groups. Then all values in the first group of the first variable were classified with an 'A', then the second group was given a 'B', and the third was given a 'C'. the same thing was done with the second variable however 1, 2 ,...
Post a Comment
Read more