Applications in GIS Module 6B

The second part of this weeks module focused on creating a corridor modeling the ideal locations for black bear travel between two protected areas in the Coronado National Forest, AZ. The factors considered for suitable travel zones were distance from roads, elevation, and landcover. Elevation and landcover rasters were given and were reclassified to fit the given criteria. The roads shapefile was ran through the Euclidian Distance tool and the resulting raster was reclassified to fit the given criteria. All were combined using the Weighted Overlay tool and the resulting raster was used as the cost raster in the Cost Distance tool with the two protected areas. The two resulting rasters from the Cost Distance tool were processed with Corridor Tool. A threshold was chosen to limit the suitable area to within 10% of the most suitable locations resulting in the corridor seen above.

Comments

GIS 6005 - Module 6

Because the data provided for the above map contained positive and negative values which ArcMap does not support for proportional symbols, the data had to be modified. All states with positive values were exported to a new shapefile and the same was done with states with negative values. This was all that needed done with the positive valued states. However, for the negative valued states a new field needed added to the attribute table and it had to be populated with the absolute value of number of jobs lost to convert them to positive integers. To prepare the data for bivariate visualization classes needed to be made. To do this, three class quantification was applied to each desired variable to divide each into three relatively equal groups. Then all values in the first group of the first variable were classified with an 'A', then the second group was given a 'B', and the third was given a 'C'. the same thing was done with the second variable however 1, 2 ,...

GIS 6005 - Module 1

General: General features were given large black font with a small white halo to increase legibility and visual contrast. The font size is the largest of any font on the relevant feature. The text was placed in a central location without overlapping other labeled features or important data. Water Features: Water features were given dark blue italic serif font. The color chosen was dark enough to allow legibility and contrast with the light blue water background. For the Golden Gate and San Francisco Bay labels they are placed in a central location within the water feature at a level angle with the page. The Lake Merced label was angled to line up and be contained within the lake. Park Names: Park labels were given a dark green color with a thin white halo to allow visibility and contrast while still keeping the labels intuitive. Font size was chosen to keep the labels within the boundaries of the park. However, due to the shape of Lincoln Park the label overhangs how...

M1 Lab: Map Critique

This modules lesson topic was the history of cartography and appropriate map design principles. The lab for this module involved looking through many maps to find one well-designed map and one poorly-designed maps in an effort to develop our own individual cartographic design styles that align with the design principles. My two maps and evaluation are as follows. Map Evaluation Template Well-designed map: Synopsis: This map shows the six Wildlife Management Area Game Zones in South Carolina. It can be used Wildlife management professionals or hunters. I think the data to ink ratio has been nearly maximized. The zones being numbered outside the legend is redundant but makes the map easier to read at a glance. There is nothing misleading, the data is substantial, and clutter is minimized to the essentials. For these reasons I think this is a well-designed map. Answer the following questions for the well-designed map: General ▪ ...

GIS Portfolio - Michael Malone

Search This Blog