M5 Lab: Choropleth Mapping

This weeks lab required the creation of a choropleth map visualizing the population density and wine consumption in Europe. Population density has been symbolized by using a graduated color scheme from light blue to purple, and wine consumption per capita has been symbolized using graduated symbols (small to large and light to dark green). We were tasked with choosing between graduated or proportional symbols, I chose graduate as the proportional symbols blocked many of the smaller European countries from view. To isolate the specific countries I wanted to symbolize and label, which varied between the primary and inset map, the data exclusion section of the symbology window was used and a query was written to omit unnecessary or redundant data. The graduated symbols used to represent wine consumption were sent through the Feature to Point tool which allowed my to move their individual positions. Similarly the country labels were converted to annotation so they could be positioned. Smaller countries required the addition of leader lines to their labels. After adding all essential map elements the legend was converted into a graphic so I could position each element, including the population density choropleth symbols being aligned for continuity of data. Everything was designed using ArcGIS Pro.

Comments

Module 5 - Unsupervised and Supervised Image Classification

This weeks module focused on classifying images using multispectral signatures. Above you can see the completed classified land cover of Germantown, Maryland. To create this image above signatures were collected that correlated to each required feature. Then bands were chosen (R:4 G:6 B:5) that contained the largest separation amongst features to minimize spectral confusion. In the above image roads and urban areas were often confused leading to a much larger area of roads than actually exist. The inset map contains a classification distance map which displays the distance each cell is (spectrally) from the sample points with brighter pixels being further than darker pixels. This indicates that brighter areas have a higher chance of error.

Lab 3: M 1.3 Assessment

Lab 2: M1.2 Standards

The task for this module was to perform an accuracy assessment on two versions of the same road network in Albuquerque. One was mapped by the city of Albuquerque (yellow) and one by Street Map USA (red). In order to perform the accuracy assessment twenty points per network needed created at matching intersections on each network. Then a reference point was digitized based on satellite imagery to represent the "actual" location for each intersection. XY coordinates were assigned to all sixty of the created points and the values were exported to an excel spreadsheet. From there the RMSE for each of the networks were calculated using the reference points. With this the accuracy assessment was completed resulting in the following: ABQ_Streets Positional Accuracy: Tested 14.84 feet horizontal accuracy at 95% confidence level. StreetMapUSA Positional Accuracy: Tested 158.56 feet horizontal accuracy at 95% confidence level.

GIS Portfolio - Michael Malone

Search This Blog