Skip to main content

M3 Lab: Cartographic Design

 




    The object of the lab in module 3 was to take the data provided and create a map of the schools in Washington DC's Ward 7. During the design of the map it was required that Gestalt's Principles of Cartographic Design were implemented to accurately display the data while maintaining visual hierarchy
    The map above used a thumbtack symbol to represent the schools in the subject area. Both increasing size and a color gradient from least to most intense were used to symbolize that schools from elementary to high school respectively. The red color for the symbols was chosen to visually emphasize the school locations in regard to the basemap. This was an implementation of Gestalt's contrast principle. To reduce school label clutter a table was used (top left)  to display the school names with their corresponding identifier. An inset map was used (bottom right) to display Ward 7's national location.
    This map was created using ArcGIS Pro. Once all layers in the provided data were added to the map the clip tool was used to isolate the schools in the Ward 7 area from the rest in Washington D.C.. This was the only tool use required to aggregate the data needed however I used the clip tool multiple more times to isolate the parks and roads within Ward 7 so that I could modify them separately from the ones in the rest of D.C.. When symbolizing the roads I used the dissolve tool to remove the plethora of lines that divided the roadways to give them a cleaner look. A gradient color and size thumbtack symbol was added using the symbology pane for the layer. Once I reached my maps desired look by changing the color scheme, I was ready to start making my layout. Two map panes were added, one for the primary map, and one for the inset map (bottom right). Gradient boarders were added to the basemap, legend, inset map, and school identifier table so to enhance their figure-ground relation, improving the visual hierarchy. Finally all essential map elements were added.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lab 5: M 2.2 Interpolation

  This weeks module focused on identifying the best interpolation method for modeling the air quality over Tampa Bay. Four methods were tested using the same set of sample points Thiessen, Inverse Weighted Distance (IDW), Tensioned Spline (seen above), Regularized Spline. Thiessen Interpolation assigns all cells in the raster with the value of the nearest sample point. IDW calculates the value of all cells by considered multiple sample points nearby and giving closer points a higher weight than further points. Both Spline methods create a smooth surface over the sample points but the regularized version creates a smooth curvature regardless of the range of values in the sample meaning cell values can end up both above and below the minimum and maximum values found in the sample. The tension model attempts to fix this by constricted the curvature of values to the ranges found in the sample points.

GIS 6005 - Module 2

  Nevada is my area of Interest. There a three separate state planes for Nevada; east, west, and central. For this reason, the state plane was not the appropriate choice. I decided to use NAD 1983 UTM Zone 11N because Nevada fits entirely within that UTM zone.

GIS 6005 - Module 6

  Because the data provided for the above map contained positive and negative values which ArcMap does not support for proportional symbols, the data had to be modified. All states with positive values were exported to a new shapefile and the same was done with states with negative values. This was all that needed done with the positive valued states. However, for the negative valued states a new field needed added to the attribute table and it had to be populated with the absolute value of number of jobs lost to convert them to positive integers.  To prepare the data for bivariate visualization classes needed to be made. To do this, three class quantification was applied to each desired variable to divide each into three relatively equal groups. Then all values in the first group of the first variable were classified with an 'A', then the second group was given a 'B', and the third was given a 'C'. the same thing was done with the second variable however 1, 2 ,...